When the Movies Get it Right: Hail Caesar! Knows How Boring Being A Lawyer Really Is

When the Movies Get it Right: Hail Caesar! Knows How Boring Being A Lawyer Really Is

How many lawyers went to law school because they were inspired by a TV or movie lawyer? I bet the number is not zero. Most of the time, you ask a lawyer why she went into the profession, she'll probably rattle off a list: earning potential, prestige, intellectual challenge, the opportunity to help others, etc. And all those are probably true. But let's face it, we live in a pop-culture saturated world and most of us would be lying if we denied being inspired, on some level, by what we saw on screen. I myself was unduly influenced by A Few Good Men. Now I probably would have become a lawyer anyway, but I can't deny that movie was the final push I needed to sign up for the LSAT. I even tried to become a JAG at one point because of it and fortunately (or unfortunately) the U.S. Navy saw right through me.

Read More

The Foggy Effect: Daredevil Season Two Shows Us What Good Lawyering Really Is

Greetings friends! I’ve returned from my two-month sabbatical to give you a take so hot you better cover your face if you don’t want your eyebrows singed off. Ready for it? Daredevil season two is pretty great about showing what it’s like for lawyers to excel at work they don’t even like.

Read More

Marvel's Daredevil Gets Young Attorneys Right

My problem with TV lawyers extends beyond my thin skin. I find those portrayals to be wildly incorrect, bearing little resemblance to what I see in the mirror every day or out in the real world with my colleagues. Lawyers are just people, after all, not robots or monsters. Too often on TV they’re slimy dirtballs or driven idealists. They’re used as the butt of jokes or as obstacles the hero has to overcome. On the rare occasion humanity is allowed to poke through, it’s often to decry the awfulness of the profession or the corruption in the judicial system. What Daredevil gets right is that for many of us, it’s not like that.

Read More

When The Movies Get It Right: Spielberg's Lincoln Understands The Law Better Than Most Movies

Before I started law school, I labored under the same misapprehension that many people do: that the law is a fixed thing with clearly delineated lines between what’s permissible and impermissible. I just assumed that law school would teach me where that line was and what sat on either side of it. My rude awakening occurred very early on in torts class when my professor’s canned response to any hypothetical from the class was “it depends.”

Read More

Advice From Attorney > Info From Internet > Nothing

Infographic_CanIUseThatPicture4.jpg

Happy Friday dear readers! I had a post planned this week about the whole GamerGate debacle sweeping through Twitter like wildfire, but then my wife went into labor on Monday night and long story short, I'm a dad now and all my energy has been spent taking care of my wife and infant daughter Hannah.

But in the very little downtime I've had at the hospital, I found this chart online and thought I'd share it with you. It lays out in fairly clear terms when you can and cannot use someone else's copyrighted work. I initially hesitated to share this chart because while the information is generally correct, the law in reality is never this clear cut, and reducing it to a simple phrase or image can be a dangerous proposition. As I wrote last October:

I like to give away lots of free legal information on this blog because I think it’s important for artists to have a basic understanding about how the law interacts with them. I was once in your shoes. I’ve had my ideas stolen, my copyrights compromised, and been in situations where a little legal knowledge could have saved me from a jam or two. At the same time, you can’t cut lawyers entirely out of the equation simply because you possess that knowledge. Legal information without analysis is just raw data. It can’t give you advice or insight. It can’t examine your specific situation and provide you with synthesized options based on that data (i.e. just because you know the fair use factors doesn’t mean you know how to apply them). No two situations are the same and everyone’s needs will differ depending on a variety of unforeseeable factors. Only a properly trained lawyer familiar with your circumstances will be able to navigate that minefield.

This is a reasonable view and I stand by it. Law without anlysis is just data, and data without analysis is useless. That said, I'm sharing this chart anyway because some of you may not have the finances to hire a lawyer, and having some information is better than having none. In fact, I've whittled it down to a pretty simple formula.

Advice From Attorney > Info From Internet > Nothing

So hang onto this chart and use it when you need to, but just remember that this is only part of the story and it may not apply to your situation. Be careful out there and call me or another qualified attorney if you have any questions about what this all means.

I'll be back soon with my thoughts on GamerGate and some other recent news items. Until then, Cheers!